This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Impax Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2017

serch-btn
Organisational Overview
Basic Information [OO 01 - 09] Gateway asset class implementation indicators [OO 10 - 12]
Strategy and Governance
Investment policy [SG 01 - 04] Objectives and strategies [SG 05 - 06] Governance and human resources [SG 07 - 08] Promoting responsible investment [SG 09 - 11] Implementation not in other modules [SG 12 - 16] Innovation [SG 17]
Direct - Listed Equity Incorporation
Overview [LEI 01 - 02] ESG incorporation in actively managed listed equities [LEI 03 - 12] Implementation processes [LEI 03 - 12] (A) Implementation: Screening [LEI 06 - 08] (B) Implementation: Thematic [LEI 09] (C) Implementation: Integration of ESG issues [LEI 10 - 12] Outputs and outcomes [LEI 14 - 16] Communication [LEI 17]
Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership
Engagement [LEA 01 - 16] Overview [LEA 01 - 02] Process [LEA 03 - 10] Process for engagements run internally [LEA 03 - 04] Process for engagements conducted via collaborations [LEA 05 - 06] General processes for all three groups of engagers [LEA 09 - 10] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 11 - 15] Communication [LEA 16] (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions [LEA 17 - 27] Overview [LEA 17] Process [LEA 18 - 22] Outputs and outcomes [LEA 23 - 26] Communication [LEA 27]
Direct – Private Equity
Overview [PE 01 - 04] Fundraising of private equity funds [PE 05 - 06] Pre-investment (selection) [PE 07 - 10] Post-investment (monitoring) [PE 11 - 15] Outputs and outcomes [PE 16 - 17] Communication [PE 18 - 19]
Direct - Property
Overview [PR 01 - 04] Fundraising of property funds [PR 05 - 06] Pre-investment (selection) [PR 07 - 09] Post-investment (monitoring and active ownership) [PR 11 - 17] Overview [PR 11] Property monitoring and management [PR 12 - 13] Property developments and major renovations [PR 14] Occupier engagement [PR 15 - 16] Outputs and outcomes [PR 18 - 19] Communication [PR 20]
Export Public Responses

You are in Direct - Property » Post-investment (monitoring and active ownership) » Property monitoring and management

Property monitoring and management

PR 12. Proportion of assets with ESG targets that were set and monitored

合計 100%

12.1. 報告年度において組織またはプロパティマネジメント会社が管理する不動産資産のうち、ESGの目標（KPIなど）を設定し、モニタリングした不動産資産の割合を示してください。

（不動産資産の件数ベース）

12.2. 組織やプロパティマネジメント会社では、主として、どのESG問題を対象にどのような目標（KPIなど）を設定のうえ進捗をモニタリングしているのか明示してください

Target/KPI
Progress Achieved 
          GHG
        
          Energy efficiency
        
          Water efficiency / occupant
        
          640 tC02 avoided
        
          52 kWh per m2 improvement
        
          7.4 m3 improvement
Target/KPI

責任投資の基準を全体的な運用会社のパフォーマンス評価の正式な要素として含める

 
          Engagement with and capacity building of occupiers
        
          Increase in waste recycled
        
          
        
          Quarterly tenant "Green Team" meetings
        
          32%

12.3. 補足情報。[任意]

At the end of the reporting period (end 2016) the Impax Climate Property Fund had only a single asset remaining, therefore a third party conducted a "shadow" assessment of the fund against GRESB criteria, following conservative scoring assumptions. This assessment pointed to the fund having again achieved "Green Star" status in the formal GRESB benchmark. The fund has formally reported to investors via the GRESB survey on 3 occasions (2011-2013), when the fund was fully invested, each time receiving a Green Star rating and twice achieving a leadership position.

PR 13. Certification schemes, ratings and benchmarks

13.1. 不動産資産が認証スキーム、格付および/またはベンチマークと比較して評価されているかどうかを示して下さい。

13.2. 不動産資産を評価する認証スキーム、格付やベンチマークを挙げ、それらを適用する不動産資産の割合を示してください。

具体的に記入してください 
          GRESB criteria, Green Star Rating
それらを適用する不動産資産の割合
（不動産資産の件数ベース）

13.3. 補足情報。

At the end of the reporting period (end 2016) the Impax Climate Property Fund had only a single asset remaining, therefore a third party conducted a "shadow" assessment of the fund against GRESB criteria, following conservative scoring assumptions. This assessment pointed to the fund having again achieved "Green Star" status in the formal GRESB benchmark. The fund has formally reported to investors via the GRESB survey on 3 occasions (2011-2013), when the fund was fully invested, each time receiving a Green Star rating and twice achieving a leadership position.  
Previous Section Next Section
Top