This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Christian Super

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

Engagement

Overview

LEA 01. Description of approach to engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

01.1. 貴社に正式なエンゲージメントポリシーがあるかどうか示してください

01.2. エンゲージメントポリシーがカバーしている内容を示してください。

01.3. エンゲージメントポリシーのURLを記載してください。[任意]

01.4. エンゲージメントに対する貴社のアプローチの概要を説明してください。

Christian Super invests members’ money in a wide range of assets. In acquiring these assets the Fund also takes on both rights and responsibilities as owners of shares, debt, property and other assets.
The Fund aims to be responsible and effective owners of the assets it holds on behalf of its members. This policy addresses the ways in which Christian Super acts as an asset owner to engage with and influence companies in which the Fund invests or to whom the Fund lends money, or invests in any other form.
The Fund aims to adopt a wisdom-based relational approach, getting alongside companies rather than establishing an unhelpful, combative situation.
Active engagement with companies is the most important method which the Fund uses to influence company behaviour.

01.5. 補足情報 [任意]

Note in addition to the Engagement Policy we also have internal procedures that govern much of the content outlined above.


LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues

02.1. エンゲージメントの方法および対話を行う理由を明示して下さい。

エンゲージメントの種類

対話を行う理由​
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント
          To further internal research
        

協働的なエンゲージメント

          To further internal research
        

サービスプロバイダーのエンゲージメント

          To further internal research
        

02.2. 補足情報。[任意]


Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. 貴社内のスタッフが実行するエンゲージメント活動を特定し、優先順位を決定する正式なプロセスが貴社にあるかどうか示してください。

03.2. 貴社内のスタッフが実行するエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する際に使用する基準を説明してください。

03.3. 補足情報。 [任意]


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted via collaborations

LEA 05. Process for identifying and prioritising collaborative engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

05.1. 協働的なエンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する正式なプロセスが貴社にあるかどうか示してください。

05.2. 協働的エンゲージメントを特定し、優先順位を決定する際に使用する基準を説明してください。

05.3. 補足情報 [任意]


LEA 06. Objectives for engagement activities (Not Completed)


Process for engagements conducted with/on your behalf by service providers

LEA 07. Role in engagement process

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

07.1. サービスプロバイダーがあなたの貴社のために実施するエンゲージメントにおいて、貴社がどのような役割を担っているのか明示してください。

07.2. サービスプロバイダーがあなたの貴社のために実施するエンゲージメントにおいて、貴社がどのような役割を担っているのか明示してください。

07.3. 補足情報。 [任意]

ACSI members, together with ACSI management, identify issues for engagement on an annual basis. Monitoring and review are done semiannually via progress reports and presentations. While members do not “specify” the particular objectives for the engagement or companies to be engaged with, they do approve ACSI’s choices. Members also attend a number of engagements each year alongside ACSI staff. In many cases, several members attend a single meeting.


LEA 08. Monitor / discuss service provider information

08.1. サービスプロバイダーが貴社に提供する以下の情報を監視、協議しているかどうかを記載してください。

Please select all that apply

08.2. 補足情報。

One of our service providers annually creates a list of engagement priority companies with specifically defined concerns and objectives for each company. Objectives are meaningful changes in company behaviour. They also sets objectives for the proportion of all priority companies where objectives are met (e.g. they may aim for over 50% of all priority companies’ objectives to be met).

Monitoring and evaluation is done through semiannual progress reports, itemized company by company and in aggregate, which are delivered to member funds.

Inbound engagements with companies that are not on the priority list also involve specific objectives, though typically less material. Monitoring of these is done through annual evaluation by Committees, and a range of internal reports. The results of these engagement meetings are also included in proxy voting reports and surveys involving all companies in a pre-defined universe (called “longitudinal” research projects).


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. 貴社がエンゲージメントしている企業の数を追跡しているかどうかを記載してください。

エンゲージメントの種類
エンゲージメントの追跡
単独/貴社内のスタッフのエンゲージメント

協働的なエンゲージメント

サービスプロバイダーのエンゲージメント

10.2. 補足情報。[任意]


Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort (Private)


LEA 12. Engagement methods (Private)


LEA 13. Engagements on E, S and/or G issues (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement (Private)


LEA 15. Examples of ESG engagements (Private)


Top