This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

North East Scotland Pension Fund

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Process

Process

LEA 18. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

18.1. (委任状による)議決権行使を通常どのように決定しているかを明示して下さい。

アプローチ

以下に基づいて行う

18.2. 補足情報。[任意]

As a long term shareholder one of the main tools open to the NESPF is to use its influence is by exercising its voting power on governance, social and environmental factors with the companies in which it invests. Apart from our Pooled Passive Fund we vote in-house on at all AGM’s and EGM’s where the Fund is entitled to vote. The Fund’s voting advice is provided by P.I.R.C (Pensions & Investment Research Consultants Ltd). PIRC is the UK’s leading independent research and advisory consultancy. In additional the Local Authority Pension Fund Forum (LAPFF) also provides us with research including the receipt of regular alerts on companies with serious corporate governance failings. Both sources of information are taken into account when making our voting decisions


LEA 19. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)


LEA 20. Confirmation of votes (Not Completed)


LEA 21. Securities lending programme (Not Completed)


LEA 22. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

22.1. 貴社または貴社に代わって行動するサービスプロバイダーは、議決権の行使に先立って、当該企業に対し懸念等を表明しているかどうか明示してください。

22.2. 貴社や貴社に代わって行動するサービスプロバイダーは、議決を棄権したり、経営陣の提案に反対票を投じる場合に、当該企業にその理由を伝えているかどうかを明示してください。

22.3. 補足情報。[任意]

When LAPFF issues voting alerts, the alerts contain the rationale for the vote recommended and are regularly sent to target companies for comment.


Top