This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Groupama Asset Management

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort

11.1. Indicate the amount of your listed equities portfolio with which your organisation engaged during the reporting year.

Number of companies engaged

(avoid double counting, see explanatory notes)

Proportion (to the nearest 5%)
Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

Individual / Internal staff engagements

40 Number of companies engaged
19.7 Proportion (to the nearest 5%)

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

11.2. Indicate the proportion of engagements that involved multiple, substantive and detailed discussions or interactions with a company during the reporting year relating to ESG issue.

Type of engagement

% Comprehensive engagements

 

 

Individual / Internal staff engagements

11.5. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 12. Engagement methods

12.1. Indicate which of the following your engagement involved.

12.2. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 13. Engagements on E, S and/or G issues (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement

14.1. Indicate whether you track the number of cases during the reporting year where a company changed its practices, or made a formal commitment to do so, following your organisation’s and/or your service provider's engagement activities.

14.2. Indicate the number of companies that changed or committed to change in the reporting year following your organisation’s and/or your service provider's engagement activities.

Number of company changes or commitments to change

Individual / Internal staff engagements

2

14.3. Additional information [Optional].

Two of the companies figuring on our ESG controversies list that we met during the year, informed us that they were aware of the problems we were raising and that they were enhancing their internal process. Their goal is to make impossible the repetition of the facts that leads us to add them on our list. One company was removed from our controversies list whereas the other was maintened because improvements were not sufficient.


LEA 15. Examples of ESG engagements

15.1. Provide examples of the engagements that your organisation or your service provider carried out during the reporting year.

Topic or ESG issue
          ESG controversies
        
Conducted by
Objectives

The objective is to inform the companies that they appear on a ESG controversy list when Groupama AM analysts are meeting with them.

Scope and Process

All companies that are deemed facing recurrent and severe ESG controversies, and that are added on Groupama AM ESG controversies list.

 

Outcomes

The reaction of the company in a one to one meeting is an important element in our assessment.

15.2. Additional information. [Optional]


Top