This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Edinburgh Partners Limited

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Process


LEA 18. Typical approach to (proxy) voting decisions

18.1. Indicate how you typically make your (proxy) voting decisions.


Based on

          Based on a service provider which we have worked closely with to develop and update their voting policy.

18.2. Additional information.[Optional]

   We have engaged ISS to assist us in the proxy voting and corporate governance oversight process by developing and updating their own proxy voting guidelines and by providing research and analysis, recommendations regarding votes, delivery of proxy instructions, recordkeeping and reporting services. Our decision to retain ISS is based principally on the view that the services ISS provides, subject to Edinburgh Partners’ oversight, will generally result in proxy voting decisions which are favourable to shareholders’ interests. Portfolio managers will review the ISS recommendations and may elect to cast votes in a manner other than in line with those recommendations, where they have good reason to believe it is in the best interests of shareholders to do so. 

LEA 19. Percentage of voting recommendations reviewed (Not Applicable)

LEA 20. Confirmation of votes (Private)

LEA 21. Securities lending programme (Private)

LEA 22. Informing companies of the rationale of abstaining/voting against management

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

22.1. Indicate whether you or the service providers acting on your behalf raise any concerns with companies ahead of voting

22.2. Indicate whether you and/or the service provider(s) acting on your behalf, communicate the rationale to companies, when , you abstain or vote against management recommendations.

22.3. Additional information. [Optional]