This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

CBRE Global Investors

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement

Engagement

Overview

LEA 01. Description of approach to engagement

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

01.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal engagement policy.

01.5. Additional information [optional]

We have an informal policy to encourage companies in which we invest to participate in the GRESB survey.


LEA 02. Reasoning for interaction on ESG issues (Not Completed)


Process

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

other description

          We prioritize by the significance of the company within the real estate sector and, by extension, our clients' portfolios.
        

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take following your engagements.

04.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals for engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.4. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.5. Additional information. [Optional]

In 2016, we targeted the 20 largest companies (by market capitalisation) in each of the MSCI US REIT Index and the FTSE/EPRA NAREIT Developed Index that did not participate in the 2015 GRESB survey. Since the two indices overlap, this yielded a list of 30 companies prioritised. Contacts were made with all 30 of these companies. Once the 2016 survey was complete, we were able to observe that three of these companies participated that had not previously. 


General processes for all three groups of engagers

LEA 09. Share insights from engagements with internal/external managers (Private)


LEA 10. Tracking number of engagements

10.1. Indicate if you track the number of engagements your organisation participates in.

Type of engagement
Tracking engagements

Individual / Internal staff engagements

10.2. Additional information. [OPTIONAL]

We track formal engagements (e.g., contacts made to encourage participation in the GRESB survey), but we do not track ad hoc engagement between our securities analysts and the companies they review.


Outputs and outcomes

LEA 11. Number of companies engaged with, intensity of engagement and effort (Private)


LEA 12. Engagement methods (Private)


LEA 13. Engagements on E, S and/or G issues (Not Applicable)


LEA 14. Companies changing practices / behaviour following engagement (Private)


LEA 15. Examples of ESG engagements (Private)


Top