This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Comgest

PRI reporting framework 2017

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » (Proxy) voting and shareholder resolutions » Outputs and outcomes

Outputs and outcomes

LEA 23. Percentage of (proxy) votes cast

23.1. For listed equities where you and/or your service provider have the mandate to issue (proxy) voting instructions, indicate the percentage of votes cast during the reporting year.

Votes cast (to the nearest 1%)

99 %

Specify the basis on which this percentage is calculated

23.2. Explain your reason(s) for not voting certain holdings

          Technical reasons related to proxy-service provider
        

23.3. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 24. Proportion of ballot items that were for/against/abstentions

24.1. Indicate if you track the voting instructions that you and/or your service provider on your behalf have issued.

24.2. Of the voting instructions that you and/or third parties on your behalf issued, indicate the proportion of ballot items that were:

Voting instructions
Breakdown as percentage of votes cast
For (supporting) management recommendations
80.8 %
Against (opposing) management recommendations
18.3 %
Abstentions
0.9 %
100%

24.3. Describe the actions you take after voting against management recommendations.

          Sometimes we inform the company of our votes and engage with it on related issues.
        

24.4. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 25. Shareholder resolutions

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

25.1. Indicate if your organisation directly or via a service provider filed or co-filed any ESG shareholder resolutions during the reporting year.

25.6. Additional information. [Optional]


LEA 26. Examples of (proxy) voting activities

New selection options have been added to this indicator. Please review your prefilled responses carefully.

26.1. Provide examples of the (proxy) voting activities that your organisation and/or service provider carried out during the reporting year.

Topic or ESG issue
          Director Election
        
Decision made by
Objectives

Ensure that a minimun board independence exists

Scope and Process

Vote against director if percentage of independence is not in line with our voting policy

Outcomes

The company called us to know why Comgest voted against a director. We explained our rationale. The company invited us to be scrutineer to the next AGM and meet up with this director.

26.2. Additional information. [Optional]


Top