This report shows public data only. Is this your organisation? If so, login here to view your full report.

Harvard University Endowment

PRI reporting framework 2016

Export Public Responses
Pdf-img

You are in Direct - Listed Equity Active Ownership » Engagement » Process » Process for engagements run internally

Process for engagements run internally

LEA 03. Process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities

03.1. Indicate whether your organisation has a formal process for identifying and prioritising engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.2. Describe the criteria used to identify and prioritise engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

03.3. Additional information. [Optional]

We prioritize engagement based on ESG risks that are likely to have a direct impact on business operations and shareholder value, influence risk management oversight and disclosure practices, and ultimately impact the value of our holdings.  For example, HMC engages with non-renewable energy companies in its listed equity portfolio.  The purpose of this engagement is to inform these companies of Harvard's perspective about the risks of climate change and request that these companies incorporate standards set by SASB into public filings and management practices.


LEA 04. Objectives for engagement activities

04.1. Indicate if you define specific objectives for your engagement activities.

04.2. Indicate if you monitor the actions that companies take following your engagements.

04.3. Indicate whether your organisation defines milestones and goals for engagement activities carried out by internal staff.

04.4. Indicate if you do any of the following to monitor and evaluate the progress of your engagement activities.

04.5. Additional information. [Optional]


Top